How we work

Editorial Policy

How Altravox researches, writes, and reviews its content — and how we stay independent.

Last updated: January 12, 2026

Trust is the only thing that makes a publication worth reading. This page explains how we research, write, review, and maintain everything on Altravox — and how we keep our recommendations independent.

How we choose what to cover

We write about the questions real listeners have: which headphones are worth the money, how a speaker actually sounds, and how to set up a system without a rat's nest of cables. Ideas come from our own listening, reader questions, and the gear people keep asking us about. We do not chase trends for traffic's sake.

How we research and review

Every review is written or edited by a named member of our team with direct, hands-on time with the product. When we recommend something, we have listened to it across real music, real rooms, and real sources. We draw on first-hand testing and primary sources — official specifications and our own measurements — rather than recycling what other sites say. Claims that depend on data are linked to their source.

Editing and review

Before publication, each piece is reviewed for accuracy, clarity, and usefulness. We ask a simple question of every draft: would this genuinely help someone spend their money well, or is it just filling space? If it is the latter, it does not run.

Our use of AI tools

Our reviews are written and edited by people who did the listening. We may use software for spell-checking, research, or suggesting outlines, but a human writer is responsible for the substance, accuracy, and final wording of everything we publish. We do not publish auto-generated content.

Independence and advertising

Altravox is funded by advertising and, occasionally, affiliate links. To protect your trust:

  • We never accept payment to give a positive review or to feature a product in editorial content.
  • Advertising is clearly distinguishable from articles.
  • Affiliate relationships never change our verdict — see our disclaimer for the full disclosure.

Corrections

We get things wrong sometimes, and when we do, we fix them quickly and transparently. If you spot an error, email [email protected] or use our contact form. Substantive corrections are noted on the article.

Updates

Because gear, firmware, and pricing evolve, we revisit popular reviews and refresh them. When an article is meaningfully updated, the publication date reflects the most recent revision.

Questions

If anything about how we work is unclear, we'd genuinely like to hear from you. Reach us any time at [email protected].